<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two ‘Nations’ At War: The Struggle Over Forest Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/</link>
	<description>media &#124; politics &#124; dissent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hindol Bhattacharjee</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hindol Bhattacharjee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nandigram--Budhya, Biman, Binoy, Communism er prakito aitijhyobahi

Budhya ki adou communist aitijhyo kei bohon korchen na? 1917 sale bolshevik biplober por sampurno khyomota dakhol ebong birodhider kantho sampurno bandho korar janyo lenin ghoshona korechilen khub taratari nirbachon hobe. er janyo notun namkoron hoechilo jar nam constituent assemble. sekhane 700 asoner modhye matro 150 ason peye lenin bhenge dilen sangsad. 1928 saale birodhira Lenin ke hotyar chesta kore. ebong tar porei neme ase lal santras. Lenin er agei gathon korechilen gupton police sanghothan &quot; Cheka&quot; jader kaji chilo kole karkhanay communist birodhi khunje peyei take hotya kora. 1918 theke 1921 porjonto je grihojudhyo cholechilo lal fouj bonam sada foujer modhye sekhane prayojon chilo ak shaktishali lalfoujer---astro o khadyosambhare susajjito. fole Leniner netrityadhin Rush Communist paarty gothon korlo war communism. Krishite sob jomir rashtriokoron holo. Malik holo rashtro. Sob atirikto khadyo o sashyer bajeapto korar adhikar thaklo rashtrer upor. ei badhyotamulok communism e bijhyubdho chashira Cheka-er hate fosol tule deoar chite ta purie diteo dyidha bodh kortona.  er fole rashia te probol khadyosankot dakha jay ar 1920-21 e neme ase durbhikhyo. shilpeo chorie jay war communism er byadhi. trade ebong dharmoghot nishidhyo hoy. ganobikhyobhe fete pore Rashian mojdur o krishokera.
lenin bolechilen amra akhono Communism pabar moto susabhyo hoe uthini. Grihojudhyokalin rashiate Lalfoujer santrase mara giechilo 7.5 million manush. nandigram ki choto angaria to er kache sishu. shet shoktike nischinho korar janyo war communism er abodan kebol Kronstad ei avyuthyan er fole nihotoder sankhya koyak hajar. petrograder pashei chilo noubahinir chauni. Kronstad. pothe pothe cholche krishok der sange lal foujer sanghorsho. Mrityudondo nischit jeneo bikhyobhe samil hochen sramikra. krishokra. fete porlo Kronstader nabikra jar baro angshe chilo Bolshebhik. 1921 saler 26 february tara ak protinidhidol pathalo ebong du din badei tara resolution gothon korlo jar sidhyantoguli chilo---bartaman soviet byabostha konobhabei krishokder asha akankhyar protifolon na. Abilombe notun sovieter janyo nirbachon hote hobe ebong ta hobe gopon ballot e. abadh o swadhin procharer sujog thakte hobe, aar jea kichu dabi segulir modhye chilo bak-swadhinota, krishokder hate tader jomi ar poshukhamarer malikana firie deoa. Trade union ebong krishok andoloner aporadhe samosto rajnaitik bondider mukti ebong jarai srom deben tader protyeker jnyo samoporiman khadyo reshoner adhikar.
etai to communist dabi...kintu Lenin eke akhya dilen shet sainyoder uskani hisebe ar tader europio samarthakder gore tole sharojontro( jano nandigram prosonge Binoy Kongar), Kujnar bollen --jodi tomra judhya chao tai pabe, amra communistra Kronstade rashtrer sashon bolobot korboi.( thik jano nandigram prasonge Biman Bosu), Trotsky 60000 shaktir lal fouj lelie dilen Kronstader nabikder upor. ( Thik jano nandigram e lakhyon Seth). nabikder nirbichare hatya kora holo. sarkari hisebe mrityur sankhya 527 ebong ahoto 4127 jon. guli kore mara holo 500 jon netristhanio nabikke. koyak hajar jonke nirbasone pathano holo krishnosagor, saiberiate.

Mone rakhte hobe Kronstader safolyo lenin ar Rashir ebong communism er itihase ak bijoypalok. nandigram er bhoyabohota aro kom. lenin jodi mohamoti akhya pete paren tahole Budhyo- Bnoy- Biman ki Communist adorshochyuto?


The difference of Industrial policy of the left front:

Between 1978 and 1994 onwards



To create working sectors in both agriculture and industrial sectors (1978). Whereas in 1994 onwards the only importance upon creating working sectors in industry only was given preference.
In 1978, the destination of the left front was to prevent monopoly house and multinational companies. Whereas after 1994, monopoly houses and multinational companies are invited and the motive is now to draw investments from them.
In 1978, to enthuse national technology was preferred. But after 1994, foreign and modern technologies are being hired.
To expand public sector was against the private sectors was given importance, whereas after 1994, private sectors are now given more and more preference.
The control of working class over industrial sectors and industrial production were given importance whereas after 1994, the owners and capitalists are given importance and working class is neglected.
In 1978, initiatives are taken to develop small scale industries but after 1994, SEZ, chemical hubs, IT sectors are now given more importance.


Is Budhya really not a communist!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nandigram&#8211;Budhya, Biman, Binoy, Communism er prakito aitijhyobahi</p>
<p>Budhya ki adou communist aitijhyo kei bohon korchen na? 1917 sale bolshevik biplober por sampurno khyomota dakhol ebong birodhider kantho sampurno bandho korar janyo lenin ghoshona korechilen khub taratari nirbachon hobe. er janyo notun namkoron hoechilo jar nam constituent assemble. sekhane 700 asoner modhye matro 150 ason peye lenin bhenge dilen sangsad. 1928 saale birodhira Lenin ke hotyar chesta kore. ebong tar porei neme ase lal santras. Lenin er agei gathon korechilen gupton police sanghothan &#8221; Cheka&#8221; jader kaji chilo kole karkhanay communist birodhi khunje peyei take hotya kora. 1918 theke 1921 porjonto je grihojudhyo cholechilo lal fouj bonam sada foujer modhye sekhane prayojon chilo ak shaktishali lalfoujer&#8212;astro o khadyosambhare susajjito. fole Leniner netrityadhin Rush Communist paarty gothon korlo war communism. Krishite sob jomir rashtriokoron holo. Malik holo rashtro. Sob atirikto khadyo o sashyer bajeapto korar adhikar thaklo rashtrer upor. ei badhyotamulok communism e bijhyubdho chashira Cheka-er hate fosol tule deoar chite ta purie diteo dyidha bodh kortona.  er fole rashia te probol khadyosankot dakha jay ar 1920-21 e neme ase durbhikhyo. shilpeo chorie jay war communism er byadhi. trade ebong dharmoghot nishidhyo hoy. ganobikhyobhe fete pore Rashian mojdur o krishokera.<br />
lenin bolechilen amra akhono Communism pabar moto susabhyo hoe uthini. Grihojudhyokalin rashiate Lalfoujer santrase mara giechilo 7.5 million manush. nandigram ki choto angaria to er kache sishu. shet shoktike nischinho korar janyo war communism er abodan kebol Kronstad ei avyuthyan er fole nihotoder sankhya koyak hajar. petrograder pashei chilo noubahinir chauni. Kronstad. pothe pothe cholche krishok der sange lal foujer sanghorsho. Mrityudondo nischit jeneo bikhyobhe samil hochen sramikra. krishokra. fete porlo Kronstader nabikra jar baro angshe chilo Bolshebhik. 1921 saler 26 february tara ak protinidhidol pathalo ebong du din badei tara resolution gothon korlo jar sidhyantoguli chilo&#8212;bartaman soviet byabostha konobhabei krishokder asha akankhyar protifolon na. Abilombe notun sovieter janyo nirbachon hote hobe ebong ta hobe gopon ballot e. abadh o swadhin procharer sujog thakte hobe, aar jea kichu dabi segulir modhye chilo bak-swadhinota, krishokder hate tader jomi ar poshukhamarer malikana firie deoa. Trade union ebong krishok andoloner aporadhe samosto rajnaitik bondider mukti ebong jarai srom deben tader protyeker jnyo samoporiman khadyo reshoner adhikar.<br />
etai to communist dabi&#8230;kintu Lenin eke akhya dilen shet sainyoder uskani hisebe ar tader europio samarthakder gore tole sharojontro( jano nandigram prosonge Binoy Kongar), Kujnar bollen &#8211;jodi tomra judhya chao tai pabe, amra communistra Kronstade rashtrer sashon bolobot korboi.( thik jano nandigram prasonge Biman Bosu), Trotsky 60000 shaktir lal fouj lelie dilen Kronstader nabikder upor. ( Thik jano nandigram e lakhyon Seth). nabikder nirbichare hatya kora holo. sarkari hisebe mrityur sankhya 527 ebong ahoto 4127 jon. guli kore mara holo 500 jon netristhanio nabikke. koyak hajar jonke nirbasone pathano holo krishnosagor, saiberiate.</p>
<p>Mone rakhte hobe Kronstader safolyo lenin ar Rashir ebong communism er itihase ak bijoypalok. nandigram er bhoyabohota aro kom. lenin jodi mohamoti akhya pete paren tahole Budhyo- Bnoy- Biman ki Communist adorshochyuto?</p>
<p>The difference of Industrial policy of the left front:</p>
<p>Between 1978 and 1994 onwards</p>
<p>To create working sectors in both agriculture and industrial sectors (1978). Whereas in 1994 onwards the only importance upon creating working sectors in industry only was given preference.<br />
In 1978, the destination of the left front was to prevent monopoly house and multinational companies. Whereas after 1994, monopoly houses and multinational companies are invited and the motive is now to draw investments from them.<br />
In 1978, to enthuse national technology was preferred. But after 1994, foreign and modern technologies are being hired.<br />
To expand public sector was against the private sectors was given importance, whereas after 1994, private sectors are now given more and more preference.<br />
The control of working class over industrial sectors and industrial production were given importance whereas after 1994, the owners and capitalists are given importance and working class is neglected.<br />
In 1978, initiatives are taken to develop small scale industries but after 1994, SEZ, chemical hubs, IT sectors are now given more importance.</p>
<p>Is Budhya really not a communist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hindol Bhattacharjee</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hindol Bhattacharjee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference of Industrial policy of the left front:
Between 1978 and 1994 onwards

1.	To create working sectors in both agriculture and industrial sectors (1978). Whereas in 1994 onwards the only importance upon creating working sectors in industry only was given preference.
2.	In 1978, the destination of the left front was to prevent monopoly house and multinational companies. Whereas after 1994, monopoly houses and multinational companies are invited and the motive is now to draw investments from them.
3.	In 1978, to enthuse national technology was preferred. But after 1994, foreign and modern technologies are being hired.
4.	To expand public sector was against the private sectors was given importance, whereas after 1994, private sectors are now given more and more preference.
5.	The control of working class over industrial sectors and industrial production were given importance whereas after 1994, the owners and capitalists are given importance and working class is neglected.
6.	In 1978, initiatives are taken to develop small scale industries but after 1994, SEZ, chemical hubs, IT sectors are now given more importance.

Is Budhya really not a communist!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference of Industrial policy of the left front:<br />
Between 1978 and 1994 onwards</p>
<p>1.	To create working sectors in both agriculture and industrial sectors (1978). Whereas in 1994 onwards the only importance upon creating working sectors in industry only was given preference.<br />
2.	In 1978, the destination of the left front was to prevent monopoly house and multinational companies. Whereas after 1994, monopoly houses and multinational companies are invited and the motive is now to draw investments from them.<br />
3.	In 1978, to enthuse national technology was preferred. But after 1994, foreign and modern technologies are being hired.<br />
4.	To expand public sector was against the private sectors was given importance, whereas after 1994, private sectors are now given more and more preference.<br />
5.	The control of working class over industrial sectors and industrial production were given importance whereas after 1994, the owners and capitalists are given importance and working class is neglected.<br />
6.	In 1978, initiatives are taken to develop small scale industries but after 1994, SEZ, chemical hubs, IT sectors are now given more importance.</p>
<p>Is Budhya really not a communist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ville-Veikko Hirvelä</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ville-Veikko Hirvelä]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kafila.org/2007/10/22/two-%e2%80%98nations%e2%80%99-at-war-the-struggle-over-forest-rights/#comment-1919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I support Mukul Sharma&#039;s view. Ville-Veikko Hirvelä, forest campaigner of Friends of the Earth, Finland]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support Mukul Sharma&#8217;s view. Ville-Veikko Hirvelä, forest campaigner of Friends of the Earth, Finland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

