<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why NAMO Loves To Hate Prof Nandy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kafila.org/2008/06/17/why-namo-loves-to-hate-prof-nandy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kafila.org/2008/06/17/why-namo-loves-to-hate-prof-nandy/</link>
	<description>media &#124; politics &#124; dissent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gulberg Memorial &#171; Kafila</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2008/06/17/why-namo-loves-to-hate-prof-nandy/#comment-26568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gulberg Memorial &#171; Kafila]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafilabackup.wordpress.com/?p=370#comment-26568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Subhash Gatade: Why NAMO Loves to Hate Prof Nandy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Subhash Gatade: Why NAMO Loves to Hate Prof Nandy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2008/06/17/why-namo-loves-to-hate-prof-nandy/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dilip D'Souza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafilabackup.wordpress.com/?p=370#comment-2456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NCCL is run by VC Saxena, who also recently wrote a protest letter to Madame Tussaud&#039;s for the positioning of Gandhi&#039;s statue there. Claimed it hurt his sentiments.

This guy is an old familiar friend. See the latter half of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/nov/20dilip.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article I wrote in 2000&lt;/a&gt;.

Ever since I saw the news about Tussaud&#039;s, I have wondered what Gandhi would have had to say about the lies and &quot;patriotism&quot; as exhibited in those ads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NCCL is run by VC Saxena, who also recently wrote a protest letter to Madame Tussaud&#8217;s for the positioning of Gandhi&#8217;s statue there. Claimed it hurt his sentiments.</p>
<p>This guy is an old familiar friend. See the latter half of <a href="http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/nov/20dilip.htm" rel="nofollow">this article I wrote in 2000</a>.</p>
<p>Ever since I saw the news about Tussaud&#8217;s, I have wondered what Gandhi would have had to say about the lies and &#8220;patriotism&#8221; as exhibited in those ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivam Vij</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2008/06/17/why-namo-loves-to-hate-prof-nandy/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shivam Vij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafilabackup.wordpress.com/?p=370#comment-2451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Subhash,

When that had appeared back in January &lt;a href=&quot;http://kafila.org/2008/01/09/ashis-nandy-on-modis-victory/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I had linked to it&lt;/a&gt; on Kafila. 

It is quite telling that Modi&#039;s men want to harass not those who call Modi a &#039;mass murderer&#039; or a &#039;maut ka saudagar&#039;. Why are they targeting Nandy for a piece which is not so much about Modi but about what Hindutva has done to Gujarati society and its Hindu middle class, almost saying they are in a trance. The piece is not only critical of secularists but also the main opposition in Gujarat, the Congress.

I think the reason why the article has evoked such a response is that it has touched a raw nerve, it has made them feel so much smaller than any accusations of &#039;mass murder&#039;.

There&#039;s a saying in Hindi, &lt;i&gt;khisiyayi billi khamba nochay&lt;/i&gt;. I can&#039;t translate it. Actually, it needs to be translated into Gujarati, not English.

Btw, 178 academics and intellectuals have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacw.net/FreeExpAndFundos/defendNandy16June08.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;signed a statement&lt;/a&gt; to protest this harassment of Nandy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Subhash,</p>
<p>When that had appeared back in January <a href="http://kafila.org/2008/01/09/ashis-nandy-on-modis-victory/" rel="nofollow">I had linked to it</a> on Kafila. </p>
<p>It is quite telling that Modi&#8217;s men want to harass not those who call Modi a &#8216;mass murderer&#8217; or a &#8216;maut ka saudagar&#8217;. Why are they targeting Nandy for a piece which is not so much about Modi but about what Hindutva has done to Gujarati society and its Hindu middle class, almost saying they are in a trance. The piece is not only critical of secularists but also the main opposition in Gujarat, the Congress.</p>
<p>I think the reason why the article has evoked such a response is that it has touched a raw nerve, it has made them feel so much smaller than any accusations of &#8216;mass murder&#8217;.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a saying in Hindi, <i>khisiyayi billi khamba nochay</i>. I can&#8217;t translate it. Actually, it needs to be translated into Gujarati, not English.</p>
<p>Btw, 178 academics and intellectuals have <a href="http://www.sacw.net/FreeExpAndFundos/defendNandy16June08.html" rel="nofollow">signed a statement</a> to protest this harassment of Nandy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

