<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Jacques Ranciere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kafila.org/2009/02/12/interview-with-jacques-ranciere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kafila.org/2009/02/12/interview-with-jacques-ranciere/</link>
	<description>media &#124; politics &#124; dissent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview with Jacques Rancière conducted by Lawrence Liang, in Delhi &#171; Verso UK&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2009/02/12/interview-with-jacques-ranciere/#comment-8527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interview with Jacques Rancière conducted by Lawrence Liang, in Delhi &#171; Verso UK&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafila.org/?p=2009#comment-8527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the full interview here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full interview here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview with Jacques Rancière &#171; dailylibrary</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2009/02/12/interview-with-jacques-ranciere/#comment-8504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interview with Jacques Rancière &#171; dailylibrary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafila.org/?p=2009#comment-8504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What was impossible was really changing a form of existence, and that is why the book was called The Nights of the Proletariat, because what was most materially and intellectually impossible for a worker is precisely not to sleep at night. This was entirely material and entirely intellectual at the same time. That was what made it important for me. Read More&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What was impossible was really changing a form of existence, and that is why the book was called The Nights of the Proletariat, because what was most materially and intellectually impossible for a worker is precisely not to sleep at night. This was entirely material and entirely intellectual at the same time. That was what made it important for me. Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Come on, people, move along, nothin’ to see here…” &#171; Simon&#39;s Teaching Blog</title>
		<link>http://kafila.org/2009/02/12/interview-with-jacques-ranciere/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[“Come on, people, move along, nothin’ to see here…” &#171; Simon&#39;s Teaching Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kafila.org/?p=2009#comment-7534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] try to become writers, philosophers, it means a displacement from their identity as workers.’ (‘Interview with Jacques Ranciére’, Kafila, February 2009) Such developments suggest that the existing order is not unquestionable, that there are other [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] try to become writers, philosophers, it means a displacement from their identity as workers.’ (‘Interview with Jacques Ranciére’, Kafila, February 2009) Such developments suggest that the existing order is not unquestionable, that there are other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

