Skip to content

UP’s Dalits Remind Mayawati: Democracy is a Beautiful

May 21, 2009
Party Vote-share Seats
BSP 27.42% 20
SP 23.26% 23
Congress 18.25% 21
BJP 17.5%
10

The higher you fly, the harder you crash. Kumari Mayawati has just learnt this lesson, and is finally giving her ever-expanding fleet of air-crafts some rest. There was clear evidence before the results were out that Dalits were not going to the polling booths to vote; if they did they wouldn’t be able to press any button other than the elephant. Dalit activists in UP had been telling me this for some time now. There were rumours that the UP police has also informed the administration of this trend.

Low Dalit turnout worries BSP

May 3: Perturbed by the low turnout of Dalit voters in the first three phases of polls in Uttar Pradesh, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) is now making special efforts to mobilise Dalits to cast their votes in the remaining two phases of the elections. According to party sources, the BSP president, Ms Mayawati, has sent out instructions to party coordinators to start mobilising Dalits to reach the polling booths on May 7 and 13 when votes are cast for the fourth and fifth phase of elections. The BSP president is said to be rather upset over the Dalit turnout in the first three phases of elections in the state, which has been “alarmingly low” — as low as 30 per cent. [Deccan Chronicle]

Then again, another news report just before the results did some hard work to establish the low turnout of Dalits, otherwise difficult to prove empirically:

A look at the decline in voting percentages in the traditional BSP strongholds of Agra area suggests that the Dalit voter who has stood like a rock behind BSP for the last two decades is showing signs of indifference if not outright disillusionment in some measure.

Booth number 58 at Tehri Baghiya under Etmadpur assembly of Agra (reserved) Lok Sabha seat, a traditional stronghold of BSP, recorded a mere voting percentage of 27.37%. In Naraich area of the same assembly segment, booth number 67 again recorded a lowly 29.17% votes. At booth number 84 the voter turnout was still less at 27.20%. Here at booth numbers 81, 82 and 83 the voting percentage could not even cross the 25% mark. Significantly the average voting percentage at these three booths in the last assembly elections was above 42%. At Nunihai booth number 126 the percentage was 24.32%. In Agra South assembly segment two polling booths in Bodla area, again a stronghold of BSP, recorded a dismal voting percentage of 27%. At Nagla Burhi in the Agra North assembly segment, which has a predominance of Jatav voters, the percentage was an abysmal 17.20%. [Central Chronicle]

After the results were out, the BSP got some pollster to fetch detailed caste-wise break-ups. These are the figures Mayawati must have looked at, and they confirm the above reports.

A CSDS post-poll study of the 2007 assembly elections had said that the BSP had got 80% Dalit votes – that is, 4 in every 5 Dalit votes. This time, the figures obtained by the BSP say that 62.2% Dalits voted for the BSP. That is nearly a 25% drop. It also means that other parties put together took away 38% of Dalit votes! This includes 12% to the Congress. The rest 26% or so has to be divided between the BJP, SP and the myriad Dalit independents and small parties.

But this statistic is of the votes Dalits cast. There is no way of ascertaining what per centage of Dalits who voted in 2007 did not come out to vote at all this time, but most in UP agree it must be around 25%.

For those who are interested*, I have phase-wise details of the Dalit votes:

Phase BSP Congress
1 74% 10%
2 59% 8%
3 65% 11%
4 53% 14%
5 60% 19%
AGGREGATE 62.2% 12%

Mayawati clearly knew this was coming, and thus locked herself up three days before the results. These numbers explain why the BSP got only 21 seats when, going by the assembly elections performance of 2007, it should have gotten 42. These numbers also explain why the BSP was the runner-up in 48 seats. This means that along with the 21 they have won, they were in the fray in a total of 69 seats, and only in 11 seats did they not stand a chance.  In 16 of these 48 seats, the losing margin of the BSP candidate was less than 30,000 votes. That is why the paradox of the BSP getting the largest vote-share in UP and yet getting the third-largest number of seats.

This means for sure that had the Dalit voter not decided to make her/his resentment apparent, the BSP could well have got 35+ seats, and perhaps halted the Congress and become a key coalition partner.

But UP’s Dalits knew she was flying too far and fast. They didn’t want to lose her to Delhi. But more on that later.

Muslims and Brahmins

First, a few myths need to be busted. Myth One: That the Muslims deserted her. And Myth Two: That the Brahmins deserted her.

Mayawati’s press conference after the debacle said Muslims were to be blamed as they didn’t vote for her, and that they didn’t do so because the Congress and SP managed to convince them that she wouldd ally with the Muslim-killing BJP.

She is creating a false bogey here, and given that she knew Dalits are not turning out to vote for at least a month, it seems she is deliberately creating the Muslim bogey. For, the figures obtained by me, the same figures that she must have looked at on Sunday morning, say that more Muslims voted for the BSP in LS 2009 than they did in Vidhan Sabha 2007 elections. The Muslim vote was split exactly three-way between the SP, Congress and BSP – Muslims were clearly not united enough to do their famous “tactical” voting, resulting in the decline of the number of Muslim MPs from UP to 6 from 11 in 2004.

The 2007 CSDS study had said the BSP got 17% Muslim votes. In the 2009 Lok Sabha, far from a dip the Muslim votes increased tremendously for the BSP. The aggregate Muslim votes for the BSP this time was 26.5%. The Congress got less than that – 22.5% Muslim votes. This is contrary to the perception that the SP’s Muslim votes shifted mainly to the Congress. At 32.3%, the SP still managed to get more Muslim votes than the others. The three-way split meant that as compared to 11 Muslim MPs in the last Lok Sabha this time there are only six. The notion of tactical voting by Muslims has gone for a toss.

For anyone interested in the Muslim break-up, here we go:

Phase SP Congress BSP
1 37.5%

(Shia – 34%, Sunni – 41%)15.5%

(Shia – 18%, Sunni – 13%)18.5%

(Shia – 17%, Sunni – 20%)

233%22%37%336%19%24%431%22%27%524%34%26%AGGREGATE32.3%22.5%26.5%

 

In phase 2, BSP actually got more Muslim votes than the SP or the Congress! Why then is Mayawati blaming Muslims? I think what she means is that she expected the Muslims going away from ulayam to come to her in much larger numbers. Instead, the split of the disenchanted Muslim votes between BSP and Congress meant that Congress got an edge in many of the seats it has won – such are the idiosyncrasies of the first-past-the-post system!

Mayawati had hoped her extra-harsh punishment to Varun Gandhi – locking up a Gandhi under NSA! – would convince voters of her secular credentials. As Netaji Mulayam Singh Yadav said regularly – at one point, three days in a row – that Mayawati would ally with the BJP after elections, he managed to save some Muslims votes for himself and the Congress. What Mayawati needed to do back then was to declare, loud and clear, that she’d never ally with the BJP. Such a declaration would hurt only baniya votes, because the Brahmins were being wooed by her anyway. But she didn’t do this, hoping to be part of an NDA government or BJP support of a Mayawati-led government. Now that she has paid the price for such ambitions, she realises she can’t have her cake and eat it too. The same Mayawati who campaigned for Narendra Modi in 2004, the same Mayawati who managed her previous two governments in UP with the BJP, the same Mayawati the RSS loves, that same Mayawati has now declared, for the first time ever, that she won’t have a truck with communal forces ever in the future!

“As for our future course of action, let me make it loud and clear that we will never join hands with communal forces.” [Link]

We must celebrate this!

Now, what about the Brahmin votes? I have the figures only for the BSP and not for other parties, and the figures show that the BSP’s Brahmin votes, coming one presumes mainly from the 20 constituencies where the BSP candidates were Brahmins, dipped only marginally. The CSDS survey had said that the BSP got 17% Brahmin votes in 2007, contrary to the hungama about the Dalit-Brahmin alliance made by the media and soem self-styled Dalit intellectuals. This time, the Brahmin votes dipped to 15%.

For those interested in phase-wise break-up:

Phase 1:      23%
Phase 2:      15%
Phase 3:      15%
Phase 4:      15%
Phase 5:      9%

So the pundits in Delhi who kept saying that the social engineering formula of the Mayawati of 2007 is breaking, were completely off the mark.

Why were the Dalits disenchated with the BSP?

When Mayawati won in 2007, she feared that her party workers, officials and MLAs would become the law of the land just as the Mulayam establishment had become. Riding on that anti-incumbency way did she come to power with an absolute majority. She didn’t want her party to become the same. So she repeatedly told her party not to pressurise the administration and the police, to let the bureaucrats function independently, to not influence transfers and postings. She wanted a clean image lest it hurt her national expansion plans and prime ministerial ambitions. But UP is UP, and to think that bureaucrats are saints is to think there’s life on the sun.

“We have to literally beg before officers, who treat us like petty servants, while they openly indulge in corrupt practices.” [Link]

Thankfully, this may change now.

The first 100 days of Mayawati did see a lot of the classic Mayawati that many in UP love: the Mayawati who doesn’t tolerate criminals and mafia, the Mayawati who established ‘tehsil’ and ‘thana’ diwas – a day of the week each for administrationa dn police when the poor in the districts line-up with their complaint letters. But if the BSP cadres can’t pressurise an SP to file an FIR in a Dalit atrocity, when the cadres can’t get an educated Dalit a government job, when the officials openly defy them, what hope is there that dalits can get anything done?

After the intial euphoria, Mayawati became so apathetic to administrative matters that till date, two years after Mayawati became CM of UP on 13 May 2007, the Below Poverty Line list of UP is the one that was made under the Mulayam regime, and one in which many deserving Dalits were left out. Since Mayawati became CM, the list has been revised twice, but the BSP workers say every time that the administrative officials have done hanky-panky with it, and every time Mayawati orders a fresh revision. So how long will a landless Dalit family wait to be able to buy cheap ration? And if such is the concern their Behenji has for them, how will he have the enthusiasm to turn up at the polling booth to press the elephant button?

In Delhi’s air-conditioned media “election war rooms,” the journalists and editors don’t know how important BPL lists are. Heck, they don’t even comment on what the state of the country is if governments can be re-elected by offering rice for Rs. 2 a kg. All they can do is sit and conjecture, ‘The Brahmins seem to be shifting’. In fact, in the results Mayawati has more Brahmins than any other caste in her 21 MPs:

This time the BSP had fielded 20 Brahmins, 20 OBCs, 17 Dalits, 15 Muslims, and six Thakurs in the state. Of this, Brahmins won at five places, Muslims and Thakurs won at four each, OBCs three and Dalits two. [Link]

And for all those who think that the BSP is only about Dalits and Brahmins, please note the figures about OBCs. And please do bring them to the notice of Dalit intellectuals.

How could the Dalits be shifting? According to the stereotype that the Delhi media  has of Dalits, that is impossible, they vote for Mayawati only because of caste, Mayawati’s voters don’t engage with governance and development, that is the problem with identity polics. The proud and brave Dalits of Uttar Pradesh are not the target consumers of the Delhi media. But they are the target audience of Mayawati. They have sent told her what they wanted to, and Mayawati has listened, the Delhi media can continue being oblivious.

But it is not just ‘development’ kind of reasons. It’s also that the ‘bhaichara’ or inter-caste brotherhood committees didn’t do their job well this time. Upper caste candidates, having bought tickets from the BSP for crores, said that delivering the Dalit votes was the BSP organisation’s responsibility. They wouldn’t even go to mobilise dalit voters. The BSP cadres were also lax. Dalit voters felt bitter that the BSP thinks they have bought their votes forever.

Mayawati may blame Muslims, but she knows it’s the foundation that has shaken. She’s started responding. She has issued a warning to government officials that not solving people’s problems will result in punishment, the way it used to be in her previous governments.

Indeed, administrative officers in UP are rattled after reports that those in charge of constituencies where BSP lost by narrow margins could get transferred. If sources in the state bureaucracy are to be believed, in the line of Mayawati’s fire are officials in 12 districts where BSP lost to Congress. There are six other districts where BSP lost marginally. [Link]

She has directed her four principal secretaries to conduct ground inspections of the work under the Ambedkar villages and Kanshi Ram Urban redevelopment schemes – schemes that primarily benefit Dalits. In an emergency meeting of the secretariat on Sunday, a day after the results, Mayawati asked that the tehsil and thana diwas be conducted properly. She has asked all IAS officers to visit one Dalit village each and find out of the development schemes were reaching the poor.

Mayawati has also made good her promise of axing several political appointees if the BSP didn’t get 50 seats. On Monday she collected resignation letters of over a hundred heads and members of several government-owned corporations who were entrusted with the task of mobilising voters. Contrary to what our enlightened papers say, these people have not been sacked. The resignations will be accepted one bye one, as Mayawati finds out exactly who in which constituency was responsible for the debacle. Last but not the least, the biggest threat of all: Mayawati plans to do site inspections of development work, the way she used to in her earlier terms, and instantly suspend officials where work was found to have been done only on paper. She called a meeting of the secretariat on a Sunday to complain that the pace of development is too slow. Which it indeed is.

All of these were features of past Mayawati governments.  It is by being thus tough she had earned the ‘Iron Lady’ image. This time, the decisive 2007 victory made her lax, she started dreaming of prime ministership and neglecting administrative work. She closed herself in her ivory tower, making herself inaccessible to workers and surrounded only by a coeterie of sycophantic bureaucrats who assured her day and night of 50 seats.

If Mulayam Singh Yadav and Mayawati were friends, Mulayam would probably tell her at this juncture, “I know how it feels.” For Mulayam knows what it is like when the ground beneath your feet shifts without a warning. Mulayam was CM of UP before Mayawati, and he didn’t realize the extent of anger that voters had against the mafia raj presided over by his brother Shiv Pal Yadav. It wasn’t the ground, it was the carpet you were standing on.

More mistakes?

In her rallies Mayawati had completely stopped using the word ‘Dalit’ – a senior BSP leader told me Dalit was a word as bad as Gandhi’s Harijan! I was shocked. In the book Behenji, Ajoy Bose writes that Kanshi Ram came to know of Mayawati only when she created a ruckus at Delhi’s Constitution Club when in a debate some speakers used the Gandhian term ‘Harijan’ rather than the Ambedkarite term ‘Dalit’. That Mayawati today wants to be Dalit without being Dalit. Given that the BSP is wooing ‘Sarvajan Samaj’ these days, they even object to the media calling her “Dalit queen”.

On Tuesday 19 May, Mayawati addressed a large gather of her party workers, MLAs, MPs, cand candidates who had lost the election. Many from outside UP were also invited. In the three hours long address, Mayawati spoke at length about BSP founder Kanshi Ram. Let’s remember Manywar Kanshi Ram ji, let’s follow the path shown by Manywar Kanshi Ram ji. It is not these workers who forgot Kanshi Ram, Behenji. It is you. It is you who has replaced Kanshi Ram with a coterie of bureaucrats and Brahmins. Kanshi Ram’s legacy does not live in them. It lives in the Dalits of Uttar Pradesh who worship him as god, and they would do so regardless of whether you put up your own statues next to his or not.

The BSP became so confident about its formula of identifying the right caste for a constituency and giving the ticket to anyone from that caste who could shell out the crores, that it forgot that even people of that caste will look at how serious the candidate is. This seems to be another realisation.

The entire party structure is being re-organised. The bhaichara committees, formed afresh after the 2007 results, are being re-formed.

It’s great that Mayawati wants to ‘return’ to the Dalit agenda, but was it really important to point out that her friend-turned-foes PL Puniya is a Dhanuk rather than a Jatav like her? The path shown by Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram, I thought, was one of dissolving caste differences between dalits and unite them. Imagine, Behenji, what impact this will have on your party’s efforts in Haryana. Will Haryana’s Dhanuks ever vote for you? Do you not want their votes? Are Dhanuks to Sarvajan Samaj what poets were to Plato’s Republic?

And does it help to falsely blame Muslims? Will they not ask: does she have the guts to ever blame Brahmins? And will the Brahmins, seeing you openly behave in this desperate state of panic, not be forced to think that rahul Gandhi is a Brahmin!

The Future

Mayawati wants her party’s Delhi unit to give her a report on how Sheila Dikshit manages to fight anti-incumbency, Clearly, she is thinking of 2012 assembly elections. For 2007, she had prepared for two years. There’s going to be no relief now for her party or the administration. In the Congress, on the other hand, Rahul Gandhi is going to believe the lie that he had something to do with the Congress performance in UP. The Congress did this wonder in UP because of the shift in Muslim votes, a nostalgic longing amongst some voters for Congress, the fact of some good candidates such as Azharuddin and Annu Tandon, etc. There’s still no sign of a Congress cadre or organisation, which is so much more important in the Vidhan Sabha elections. The BSP and SP will again be the principal players in 2012, and if Mayawati continues giving her helicopters some rest, she may spring yet another surprise.

Tailpiece

Dalits kept at home to give Mayawati a reality check. The Dalits of UP know this and Mayawati knows this. But who is Chandra Bhan Prasad blaming for Mayawati’s poor showing? The OBCs, of course!

In opposing the nuclear deal, Mayawatti was sucked into the Third Front, mostly a conglomerate of Shudras/OBCs. Brahmins of UP along with Dalits want freedom from the Shudra/OBC rule of Mulayam Singh Yadav. [Link]

Some things never change.

_______

* Uttar Pradesh went to the polls in five phases, with nearly the same number of seats in each phase, roughly from east to west. So phase one was east-most and phase 5 west-most. See map here (.pdf) and for the names of constituencies in every phase, see page 29 of the .pdf file here.

33 Comments leave one →
  1. anuj permalink
    May 21, 2009 11:42 PM

    excellent post shivam but a few comments/questions:
    a. bsp indeed has the highest vote share. but thats partly inflated because it was the only party that contested all 80 seats. congress i think contested less than 70. and bjp + rld would be a more revealing figure for their vote share.
    b. you give party-wise vote share for dalits and muslims, but not for brahmins. that will be interesting to share too particularly because people are already fantasising about a revival of the old congress combo of brahmins/dalits/muslims led by brahmins of course. clearly dalit vote percentage for congress is still quite low, but that makes the questions of brahmin vote all the more interesting.

    c. What is the source of these community vote share- figures that you cite.

  2. bhim mauraya permalink
    May 22, 2009 8:41 AM

    Shivam,
    You refer to Dr Chandra Bhan Prasad at the end of your article. We should consider his argument related to Dalit empowerment seriously even though it may be inconvenient to self-proclaimed “progressive dalit activist”. He suggests the following:
    1/ Urbanisation, Globalisation and Capitalism are essential for dalit empowerment. They will dismantle the feudal structure of the Indian villages provides the structure caste and varna system.
    2/ Given the decline of agriculture and the fact that by and large dalits are landless, they will get jobs only in service and industry sector. These sectors can only come up under capitalism and not socialist regiemes.
    3/ In these days, almost all caste atrocities committed in villages across India against dalits are committed by OBCs. It is the OBC section for reasons i donot want to go into here, will be the largest loser, economically and socially if capitalism and urbanisation happen.

    In this scheme of things, i think the congress is the best political option. Chandra Bhan may disagree with me because even though he talks of liberalism amongst dalits, he will still want Mayawati as his leader.
    The break up you provide in your article above is highly confusing and does not tell the whole story. You provide caste wise breakup of voting. Can you also give a breakup of how different subcaste or gotr of dalits voted. My information is that only one subcaste of dalits voted for mayawati. And they are the most economically and politically powerful. The poorest of the poor dalits have voted for congress. Since you are a mayawati supporter you may have ignored the this fact.

  3. May 22, 2009 12:59 PM

    Anuj, yes, one should add RLD to BJP, unfortunately the RLD figure is not available yet. Congress contested 69, supported an independent in 1 (who lost) and didn’t contest 10. Even if they had contested these 10, the vote share diff of Cong and BSP would be substantial. Ditto for BJP+RLD methinks.

    Unfortunatley I don’t have the complete data but will have in some time, and unfortunately I can’t reveal source except to say that these are the figures the BSP has obtained and these are the figures Behenji is looking at. They are of course as susceptible to error as any post-poll study.

    We should have a data deluge from EC and CSDS-Lokniti sooner than later.

    Dear Bhim Mauraya,

    The data avilable is Dalit is a whole and not just chamar. It is true that the BSP is chamar led but a high number of non-chamar Dalits do vote for the BSP as well. That’s one of the things BSP has worked hard on over the years. If the Dalit attrition this time was more non-chamar than chamar, and a study can estbalish this, it would indeed be interesting. But many non-chamar Dalit castes are split between BJP and BSP, and Pasis vote for both BSP and SP…

    I think your suggestion that Dalits should vote Congress is dangerous, feudal and avoidable! Your points about CBP are irrelevant to my post above.

    Many thanks for commenting

    shivam

  4. May 22, 2009 9:24 PM

    [em]But this statistic is of the votes Dalits cast. There is no way of ascertaining what per centage of Dalits who voted in 2007 did not come out to vote at all this time, but most in UP agree it must be around 25%.[/em]

    Do you mean we cant know what percent of Dalit electorate cast their votes? and compare with that of 2007 election? Without that any analysis of Dalit votes will be inconclusive.

    [em]The CSDS survey had said that the BSP got 17% Brahmin votes in 2007, contrary to the hungama about the Dalit-Brahmin alliance made by the media and soem self-styled Dalit intellectuals. This time, the Brahmin votes dipped to 15%.[/em]

    If you normalise it for increase in number of Brahmin-BSP candidates (86/403–2007 to 20/80–2000) I think the margin will be higher.

  5. radhika permalink
    May 22, 2009 10:34 PM

    an interesting post shivam. pity you can’t reveal the source of the survey which is central to your piece. it does get quite tricky to comment on a survey and its analysis without examining its methodology.

  6. bhim mauraya permalink
    May 23, 2009 11:37 PM

    Shivam
    Thanks for the response. I would like to know your views on the recent transfers that bheneji did in UP administration. Several IPS, DM and Cooperatives head were shunted out. Don’t say that Cong, CPM and BJP have also indulge in such corrupt political practices. Because then it will mean she is no different.
    As regards your point that
    “I think your suggestion that Dalits should vote Congress is dangerous, feudal and avoidable! Your points about CBP are irrelevant to my post above.”
    Let me remind you that power hungry opportunists like Behenji have addressed meetings with Narendra Modi and alligned with BJP in past. Her statement that Muslims did not vote for her also is an indication of her secular credentials. (I know you will remind us of 1984, maliana, bhagalpur riot and say cong also did it.). So again behenji is not different.
    It would be good to know your views.

    • May 27, 2009 4:26 PM

      Bhim Maurya ji,
      Mayawati has ordered that Dalit violence be addressed immediately.
      Can you let me know your views on this?

      You talk about 1984 and Bhagalpur. Can you tell me one incident where the BSP has used violence to mobilise votes? Every other party, with exceptions like RJD and NCP, have done this. But BSP hasn’t. Can you tell me your views on this?

      As for Mayawati campaigning for Modi, and blaming Muslims, it’s all addressed in my post above which I’m sure you haven’t read.

      As for the transfers, I see nothing wrong with it. If on the basis of results she has feedback that administrative and police heads in some districts are not doing their job well and people are fed up of them, what’s wrong about transferring them? Is the Constitution being violated here?

      You write, “Because then it will mean she is no different.” I ask, why do you expect Behenji to be different? Why do all Mayawati baiters always ask her to be all-clean, all-perfect Mahatma Gandhi (so to speak, the irony was unintended!) As a politician Mayawati is but naturally the product of the political context of Uttar Pradesh and India. A political context and culture which the mai-baap Kangress Partie has contributed to more than anyone else…

  7. May 26, 2009 3:21 PM

    A CSDS report in The Hindu today says:

    The other major limitation is its dependence on Dalit votes. The NES 2009 data suggests that the party draws a majority of its voters from Dalits — 52 per cent all over the country and 55 per cent in U.P. Nationwide, only about three to four per cent of the upper castes, peasant proprietor castes and Other Backward Castes voted for the BSP. Its support levels among the Scheduled Tribes were two per cent and among Muslims seven per cent. This time, the BSP secured a
    quarter of the Dalit vote in the country, just five percentage points behind the Congress. But a disproportionate amount of the BSP’s Dalit votes is confined to the Jatav community to which Ms. Mayawati belongs.

    There may be a third and somewhat hidden limitation of the BSP. About a quarter of BSP voters said their main consideration was that people of their caste or community supported the party. Only five per cent of respondents said they expected to benefit from the party coming to power and only 12 per cent voted for it because they felt its overall programme was good. It is important to note that the party receives greater support from voters who feel that the performance of the State government is more important than that of the Central government. While the party’s non-Dalit voters are unhappy about its nonperformance on the development front, Dalit supporters are also beginning to be resentful: 46 per cent of Dalits believe Ms. Mayawati has ignored their aspirations by promoting Brahmins and upper castes. As the BSP makes a transition from the politics of ‘bahujan samaj’ to that of ‘sarvajan samaj’ and looks for the ‘plus vote,’ it would do well to address some of these anxieties.
    [Link - .pdf]

  8. May 27, 2009 10:01 AM

    Excellent piece, and much food for thought here.

    One question: given that the BSP’s vote share has actually increased vis-a-vis 2004 (albeit less than expected), and has only declined relative to the 2007 assembly elections, shouldn’t we also see what the data is on whether or not voters tend to vote differently in assembly versus Lok Sabha elections?

  9. May 27, 2009 10:08 AM

    PS on my comment above, note that the source Shivam cites in his comment above itself claims “It is important to note that the party receives greater support from voters who feel that the performance of the State government is more important than that of the Central government.” — which might suggest that voters could be voting differently in assembly and Lok Sabha elections.

    Re: “one should add RLD to BJP”

    According to The Hindu (http://www.hinduonnet.com/nic/howindiavoted2009/howindiavoted2009.htm), this combined figure is ~20%, way less than the BSP’s 27.4% (see http://www.hinduonnet.com/nic/howindiavoted2009/page1.pdf)

    • May 27, 2009 4:29 PM

      Yes, BJP Cong have always performed better in LS polls than in VS. Voters do make this distinction, but only somewhat

  10. May 27, 2009 10:17 AM

    One thing confused me about this piece: when you say that Mayawati is blaming Muslims, you also posit the factual support for her belief, but you don’t address why she is saying this, i.e. what political end is served by this sort of assignment of responsibility? Is her point that Muslims have been more resistant to the call of Dalit-BahujanISM (I had written a post some years ago arguing for greater receptivity: http://qalandari.blogspot.com/2005/08/muslims-dalit-bahujans.html; and of course activists like Ejaz Ali have long been working to mobilize Muslims in that way: http://www.indianet.nl/dalmusl.html)? But as you note, that’s an odd point to make at the very moment that you are drawing more Muslim votes than ever before…

    • May 27, 2009 4:31 PM

      Exactly my thoughts. But I’ve addressed this in my post – I think what she’s saying is that her Varun Gandhi gamble didn’t pay off, that she thought she’ll attract the Muslim vote running away from Congress, and she realises she has some BJP taint-paint on her, and has thus declared for the first time ever that she’ll never ally with communal forces.

  11. Manoj Kumar permalink
    May 27, 2009 2:47 PM

    Out of the 20 MPs of BSP – only 3 are dalits and 5 of them are Brahmins. BSP should be renamed as Brahmin Samaj Party.

    • May 27, 2009 4:18 PM

      If of the 17 Dalit candidates 14 lost, is it the fault of the 5 of 20 Brahmin candidates who won? Though I still agree about the need to renomenclature – it should be Sarvajan Samaj Party now

  12. May 27, 2009 7:13 PM

    Those who expect Mayawati to be some kind of political saint — and then criticize her when she isn’t that way — must answer the question why the bar is set so high for her and not for others. I might add that, where the media is concerned, there is ample evidence of a class (i.e. not caste) bias too, where “English-medium” politicians always get softer media coverage (fawning in the case of Rahul Gandhi), whereas others don’t get the same solicitude. The point isn’t that Mayawati is or ought to be above reproach (the BSP seems to be more interested in coming to power and capturing the bureaucracy rather than engage in the sort of sweeping agenda that is cultural, not just political, and can hope to be transformative), or that Rahul Gandhi is or isn’t a decent chap — the point is that the luxury of this wholesomeness is a function of privilege.

  13. bhim mauraya permalink
    May 28, 2009 10:33 AM

    Dear Shivam,
    Thanks for the response.
    In the 1980s, when Bhaglpur, Hashimpura, Delhi, Nelie, Moradabad etc massacres took place under the Congress rule, BSP did not exist. Yes DS4 and Kanshi Ram were around but they were non players at that time. So is BSP wasn’t there how could it have organized the violence. Subsequently in 1990s, Mayawati formed a coalition government with the fascist BJP and RSS on several occasions in UP. She facilitated recruitment of large number of RSS cadre at local level in sectors like school teachers, police officers, medical workers and karamcharis. This was one of the most damaging things Mayawati has done. Building statues and celebrating birthday is political circus but helping RSS is not. Supporting Modi in Gujarat was in line with that. Now you can’t fool people around when these fact are out there in open for everyone to see. But I guess you would still like to believe she is secular and the minorities can depend on her for protection.
    As regards your point of transfers of police officers and cooperative heads, its obvious that she did it not do it for the love of good administration but because they did not assist her in winning last elections. This is making a mockery of democracy. Indian democracy has many shortcomings and but it is authoritarian and power hungry politicians like Mayawati who are out to destroy it in a hurry. By the way, some “radical” supporters of Mayawati dismiss Indian constitution as a farce and democracy a sham. They would be thankful to Mayawati for facilitating their cynicism!
    Some of us thought that it is a dangerous trend that there is such an uncritical support for politicians like Mayawati by self-styled urban radicals, who do this to massage their own ego. However, the Indian electorate, which is by and large “poor”, rural and “uneducated” has taught a lesson to the Krarats and the Mayawati’s!

  14. C . L . CHUMBER permalink
    June 16, 2009 4:41 PM

    I am very much impressed by this conclusion ,” But UP’s Dalits knew she was flying too far and fast. They didn’t want to lose her to Delhi. But more on that later. ”

    Ms Mayawati is due to Saheb Kanshi Ram ji . She killed her Saheb with the conievence of the entire parliament , political parties and the judiciary . Neither any member of the both houses of the parliament or any political party head issued any statement regarding this . Once Mr. Paswan criticized Ms mayawati at Jalandhar but he did nothing to get him released from the Mayawat Jail at Hamanyu Road , New Delhi !

    The manuwadis honoured her by voting her in the U.P. assembly election 2007 . Now Mayawati criticize the Congress as well as extend support to the congress government at centre ! What an irony !

  15. kumarpushp permalink
    July 11, 2009 12:50 AM

    Dear Bhim mayrya,you are telling that mayawati had appointed the RSS worker as teacher which is totally nonsense.Hindus are born enemy of dalits ,How dalits can forget hindu god rama who had killed dalit shmbukha.

  16. Nikhil permalink
    July 11, 2009 3:23 PM

    moral of the story building memorials and own statues do not win votes. Development at the ground level does that. Caste based politcs have de generated to a level, where these parties had decided that they will come to power just by harping on caste lines and spewing venom at all and sundry.. i hope they wake up and provide policies for actual upliftment of the masses than building statues and calling for abolishing english and computers….that is the attitude that needs to be destroyed.

  17. kumarpushp permalink
    July 11, 2009 5:44 PM

    Dear Nikhil , Maywati never said that donot use computer or english,none of BSP workers wear dhoti or kurta,this is OBcs clan who are asking for hindi , hindu,hindustan,you have to destroy the hinduism from the earth which is bad for dalits and other minorities .Hinduism is giving only cow shits and her urine which ,all hindus are drinking and behaving mad like their gods and godeses.If you want to India to succedes then you have to annhilate the hinduism from the earth first.

Trackbacks

  1. CSDS data on caste voting patterns in UP LS ‘09 elections « Kafila
  2. The untold stories of a political process « Kafila
  3. उत्तर प्रदेश चुनाव 2012 और पसमांदा मुस्लिम समाज « Kafila
  4. A Election in Sarvajan Samaj « Kafila
  5. मायावती जी के मुख्यमंत्रित्व काल का एक संक्षिप्त विवरण: राम कुमार « Kafila
  6. Seeing UP from Phulpur « Kafila
  7. Why Rahul Gandhi’s Congress flopped in Uttar Pradesh « Kafila
  8. Some thoughts on the “hawa” in Indian elections « Kafila
  9. Why Mayawati’s defeat is the BSP’s victory « Kafila
  10. A Flawed Democracy – The Case for Proportional Representation in India: Srinivasan Ramani « Kafila
  11. Thinking through UP election results with numbers: Rahul Verma « Kafila

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54,655 other followers

%d bloggers like this: