Skip to content

Hypocrisy beneath hammer-and-sickle sign: Sankar Ray

February 26, 2011

Guest post by SANKAR RAY

Sankar Ray is a veteran journalist based in Kolkata

[This article presents the sordid tale of land acquisitions for the New Rajarhat Township and the involvement of important CPI(M) personnel in this game. One of them, the key protagonist of the story below, was mentioned by Pranab Mukherjee in parliament yesterday, taunting the CPI(M) over its claims to be a crusader against corruption, arousing the ire of its MPs. - AN]

Calling it a ‘shocking experience”, after a visiting a segment of oustees in the Narmada Valley in mid- August 2002,  Sarla Maheswari, then CPI(M) member of Rajya Sabha member told the media – as if her heart bled, and with revolutionary conscience ablaze:  “How can a development project create a disaster in the lives of the most downtrodden tribal people and also thousands of farmers of a huge area? How can it ravage their lives without any protest by mainstream political parties?  Truth indeed is stranger than fiction as the same fire-eating  ‘communist MP’s demagoguery is now in a hot soup as I-T sleuths raided  at  her residence, as a sequel to  detection of an unaccounted sum of Rs 31 crores and 26 benami companies, belonging to the Canopy Group whose chairman is her husband Arun Maheswari. And the CPI (M) brass at the Muzaffar Ahmed Bhavan, Bengal CPI(M)’s state headquarters keep up their recalcitrance, not even demanding a ‘show cause’ of the cash-rich ‘comrade’ . Former MP and CPI(M) CC member Mohd Selim, a spokesman of state party leadership too, ruled out any punitive step until specific indictment by the I-T department, leave alone criticizing the shady land transactions in the controversial New Town project at Rajarhat fully with the knowledge of ‘comrade Sarla Maheswari’  and her family.

The noveau riche that flourished with the patronage M A Bhavan, like the Maheswaris, do not come under the media-hyped ‘rectification programme’. Rather they treat the LF regime as their milch cow. The All Bengal Electricity Consumers Association divulged another scandal of tête-à-tête between the CPI(M) minister and the Maheswaris. Son-in-law of the Maheswaris got a Rs 26 crore order for installation of electric meters to the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Ltd, a state government undertaking, but most of the meters are of inferior quality. ABECA general secretary Sanjit Biswas cited numerous bills of consumers in Asansol-Durgapur region where abnormally inflated. WBSEDCL authorities too admitted anomalies in the floating of the tender, although no action has been taken against the company.

Last year, when a  series of scandals around the Vedic village, part of the aforesaid project, with one  Rajkishore Modi at the helm, came to light, the involvement of several CPI(M) ministers and state committee members was clearly evident. Several hundred crores of rupees enriched the coffers of Maheswaris minus cut monies to goons, middle men and of course, senior comrades, but  M A Bhavan Mandarins didn’t touch the Maheswaris and their filial associates.

The late Subhas Chakraborty, minister in the LF government until his death in 2009, told a few officers of West Bengal Civil Service in 1984 pointing out at the Bhangar-Rajarhat area with standing crops : “ Wait for a few years. You will have an urban sprawl”. In the mid-1980s Kamal Gandhi, close relative of the Maheswaris  and Gandhi-Mahgeswari  filial contacts started buying up acres and acres  of farm  lands paying higher prices than the prevailing market rates – between Rs  30,000- 40,000 per acre when market rate was between Rs15,000 – 20,000. They had advance information about a large township project. Gandhi “could easily get access to the various plans relating to the township project and related documents from the Alipore treasury,” and proceeded “with a definite plan of land procurement’ in collaboration with the biggies of M A Bhavan, not just the concerned  district, zonal and local committees. Catalysts were anti-social elements – harmads –  and the police who  “used to isolate and encircle the unwilling farmers and blockade and threaten them, forcing them to finally come to a settlement by selling off their land to him”. Chakraborty, probably  shocked at the manner small and middle peasants were dispossessed through shady land deals sensed an omen in the late 1990s. “ I am not for any new township”, although  never known to be a comrade of high principles.

A booklet, published by the CPI(ML) Liberation – Cries of distressed people beneath Rajarhat Satellite Town ,  vividly chronicled the  bonhomie between M A Bhavan brass and anti-social gangs in tandem with the Maheswaris.“ With the construction of the satellite township by evicting lakhs of peasants at Rajarhat New Town, lumpen industrialist Rajkishore Modi and company built up a sex tourism-cum-country club named ‘Vedic Village’ at Shikharpur just outside the satellite township area under the “Bhangar Rajarhat Area Development Authority between 1997 – 2002. Call girls from across the world began to gather at Vedic Village to entertain the high profile customers. As the resort flourished, the requirement of land increased and a new land grab drive was unleashed at gun point with the help of Gaffar Molla (a comrade too, adept in manipulation of voting in favour of CPI(M) and his goons. Although the original project was developed on 44 acres of vested land taken on lease from the state government, the area of land presently under occupation of the resort is around 150 acres….. Resorts like Vedic Village, Olive Garden, and other sex tourism centres came up within the second township. Rajkishore Modi initially purchased 10 acres of land at Shikharpur with the active help of ex-RS member of CPI (M) Sarla Maheswari, her near relative, land-shark Kamal Gandhi, Pijush Bhagat et al by launching a fake company named Sanjibani Project and similar other companies.” Maheswari, owner of Olive Garden and Gandhi, the kingpin of the land grab had very close rapport with Jyoti Basu and his side-kicks.

The unseemly hurry in okaying mutation for the Sanjibani Project stupefied many, thanks to the overactive CPI(M) central committee member and West Bengal’s Housing and Public Health Engineering  minister Gautam Deb who spearheads the polemics against the railway minister and All India Trinamool Congress chairperson, Mamata Banerjee, to prevent the end of the 34-year LF rule. Pranab De, ex-general secretary, West Bengal Land Reform Officers’ Association, made a startling revelation on highly questionable deals by Deb’s department in a booklet, published by Kolkata-based social action forum Nagarik Mancha.  Minister Deb appears as one unaabsehd collaborators of the state-sponsored plunderers who pushed hundreds of tillers to agonizing uncertainty.  On 19 June 1997, additional district magistrate and head of  land and land reform matters, North 24 Parganas district, refused to endorse mutation of 94 acres land  in favour of 11 companies in a letter to the joint secretary, PHE department. “ Initially the companies could not be served notice as their offices do not appear to exist. Thereafter, it was seen that all the companies have appointed one Sri Anil Maheswari to deal with all the matters relating to mutation/conversion….The concerned plots are to be in cultivating possession of RS recorded raiyats as seen by the revenue officer”. De who worked for three decades in land-related matters laments, “The West Bengal Housing Board recommended mutation for some persons and companies that never existed but occupied huge tracts of land under the New Township project through fictitious documents”. Identification particulars of Anil Maheswari are easy to conjecture.

Tailpiece: CPI(M) recently  shifted the district party headquarters from the residence of Maheswaris. A strange feat of rectification.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. February 26, 2011 9:00 PM

    The Maheswaris are probably too high up to save themselves. But a vast amount of minor and not so minor rats are deserting the sinking ship and finding space in the camp of the would be rulers, including in Rajarhat. We have a report on Rajarhat in the November-january issue of Radical on this.

  2. जगदीश्वर चतुर्वेदी permalink
    March 15, 2011 10:34 AM

    तथ्य की दृष्टि से गलत हैं इस लेख की सूचनाएं। मसलन मात्र दो लाख 50 हजार नगद रूपये माहेश्वरी परिवार के यहां से मिले आयकर वालों को,होसकता है इस लेख के लेखक को ये जानकारियां कहीं से मिली हों ,लेकिन ये काफिला जैसी साखदार वेबसाइट पर कम से कम अफवाहों पर आधारित लेख पढ़कर अफसोस ही होता है। इस लेख की साख इसलिए संदिग्ध है क्योंकि माहेश्वरी परिवार की अधिकांश जमीन राजारहाट में नहीं उससे आगे के इलाके में हैं जिसे ब्रेडा कहते हैं। कम से कम लेखक को भूगोल का ज्ञान तो रखना ही चाहिए।

  3. buddhadev bose permalink
    March 25, 2011 10:23 PM

    WBSEDCL has refused to give me information i requested through an RTI application.

    I had requested the WBSEDCL to let me know the name of the person (s) having electricity connection in a Plot No in Block Ac in Sector I of the Salt Lake City , Kolkata.

    The SPIO has rejected the application on the following grounds
    1) I did not mention the name of the group electric company of the area,
    2) WBSEDCL does not maintain a list of consumers based on address, but only on the basis of consumer nos. -hence I have to give the consumer no if I want to get the detail of the consumer.

    I am unable to understand what the learned SPIO is having in mind.
    Suppose the above mentioned plot is having a large sum as outstanding & I apply for a fesh connection, will the WBSEDCL just ignore the address and ask me to give the consumer no of the defaulting consumer in order to dispose my application ?

    Why is the SPIO shirking from his duty of filmsy grounds ? Are the Authorities of WBSEDCL callous enough not to maintain
    1) proper RECORD OF the Group Supply Cos. Based on geographiocal locations ?
    2)Proper record of consumers based on PLot Nos at Salt Lake City ?
    3) List of useless and unproductive executives who are meant to provide interface with the consumers at large ?
    4) Disciplinary action against executives who will be the cause of attraction of penal action on WBSEDCL ?

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56,745 other followers

%d bloggers like this: