Skip to content

What does it mean to be a Muslim in India today?: Mahtab Alam

March 21, 2011

Guest post by MAHTAB ALAM

Shahina KK

Recently, Shanina K K, a journalist from Kerala, who worked with Tehelka news weekly and now works with Open magazine, received the Chameli Devi Award for being an outstanding woman journalist. While receiving the award she said, “See, I happen to be a Muslim, but I am not a terrorist.” What made her say that and what was she trying to convey or explain? It means, as she explains, “If you belong to the minority community, they will also profile you. It is very difficult to prove that you are not a terrorist. It is equally difficult to prove that you are not a Maoist in our life and times.”

Shahina has personal experience of it, so she must know. As most of us are aware, she has been falsely framed in under sections 506 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, for ‘intimidating’ witnesses in the Abdul Nasir Madani case. Her only ‘crime’ was that she investigated the case of Kerala PDP leader Abdul Nasir Madani, who is an accused in the infamous Bangalore blasts case, and asked the question, “Why is this man still in Prison?” Madani had already spent 10 years in prison as an under-trail in the Coimbatore blast case of 1997 and who was later acquitted in 2007.

In fact, this writer has also had a similar personal experience, but thankfully, to a lesser degree of threat to his life during a fact finding visit of Giridih Jail in the state of Jharkhand, in July 2008. I was branded a Maoist along with two other friends, and illegally detained for five hours by Giridih Superintendent of Police, Murari Lal Meena who is now being promoted to the rank of DIG, Special Branch of the Jharkhand Police. He had also threatened to put us behind bars in the same prison without any hope of being bailed out for at least a year.

But this is not the story of some Shaina and Mahtab alone. This is a story, very typical of what happens to hundreds of Muslim youngsters who are arrested and tortured by the police with no evidence or on false charges. The testimonies published in two reports that have been released recently by ANHAD and Human Rights Watch show what it means to be a Muslim in India today. They are nothing short of spine chilling.

Nisar Ahmed, whose son Saqib Nisar is an accused in the 2008 bomb blast cases and who was arrested by Delhi Police after the infamous ‘encounter’ at Batla House says in HRW’s report, “When I asked my son if he was tortured, he said, ‘They are hardly going to treat me with love. They want to build the case… They used to make us memorize a story of the police version of the case. We were not allowed to sleep until we could recite the police version.”

Another testimony reads, “In August 2010, Mohammed Salman, a 17-year-old held in Delhi’s Tihar Jail in connection with bomb blasts in the capital, appeared in court with his head bandaged. Salman told the judge that two inmates had repeatedly slashed his face with a razor blade earlier that month. He said that the jail authorities “did nothing” to prevent the incident – international law prohibits the incarceration of children under 18 with adults – although he had twice requested transfer because he feared for his safety and when no action was taken against the attackers. He also accused guards of laughing and saying: “He is a terrorist and this is what should happen to him, anyway.”

I also remember Ataur Rahman of Mumbai, in his mid-sixties, whom I met during the people’s tribunal on the ‘Atrocities Committed against Minorities in the Name of Fighting Terrorism’ at Hyderabad in August 2008. At the tribunal he had told us, “My house was raided on July 20, 2006, by the anti-terrorism squad at around 9.30pm… they frisked our house and took three computers unlawfully and whisked me away to an unknown destination. For several days I was kept in illegal custody. I was then formally shown to be arrested on July 27, 2006, and an FIR was lodged against me… Me, my wife, my daughter and daughter-in-law were paraded before my arrested sons. We were abused and foulmouthed at by the police officers continuously. For all these days I was beaten up before my sons, similarly my sons were beaten up in front of me. The women of the family who were called up by the ATS daily were asked to drop their burqah before my arrested sons, and the sons were humiliated in front of the women folk by hurling abuses at them… The third day: I was again taken before my sons, who were handcuffed in the adjoining room. Here one officer… whom I can identify, beat me up and threatened me that the women in my family are outside and they will be stripped naked if I do not remove my clothes before my children and other police officers. Some other arrested accused were also brought there and I was stripped naked…”

There are hundreds of stories like this. Not only that, even if you are a non-Muslim and believe that Muslims have right not to be tortured, illegally detained and unnecessarily harassed, then you are doing a crime! Take the case of Vinod Yadav, a human rights’ activist and friend of mine from Azamgarh. Vinod was very active after the ‘encounter’ at Batla House and declaration of Azamgarh as ‘Nursery of Terror’ by both security agencies and media houses. In October 2008, when a joint fact finding team of PUDR, APCR, Janhastakshep and NCHRO visited Azamgarh and to which I was part of, he played a major role in to carry out the fact finding. But that cost him a lot. Within a week of our visit, he was arrested on a flimsy charge of cheating along with another activist Sarfaraz Alam at Lucknow station as they arrived from Azamgarh. They were taken by the state police to a secret detention centre in Lucknow and severely beaten for two days for participating in rallies against abuse of Muslim suspects in the bombings. Vinod was repeatedly told… ‘you are a Hindu and you are questioning the statements we make about Muslim boys and that is not good… You should not be seen with these Muslim people again, and if you don’t understand this, the future will be bleak for you’.

To be a Muslim in India today is to be encounter-able, to be constantly suspected of being a terrorist, to be illegally detainable and severely tortured, to have the possibility of being killed without being questioned, no matter if one is a believer, agnostic or an atheist. Carrying a Muslim name deserves and qualifies for the above treatment!

(Mahtab Alam is a civil rights activist and independent journalist. He can be reached at activist dot journalist at gmail dot com.)

10 Comments leave one →
  1. JITENDRA permalink
    March 21, 2011 2:00 PM

    there is a famous say in english ‘If you want to kill a dog first brand them by bad name’. It is aptly to the above article. Muslim is victim of the bad name. i think every minority in the world easily be targeted. first brand them by giving bad name then it become easy to hunt them.

    • Mohammed Siddiq A R permalink
      March 21, 2011 3:52 PM

      Mr.Jitendra -well said and an excellent article about the exact status of Muslims in their own country,too pathetic :(

  2. March 21, 2011 3:15 PM

    Fortunately I attended in the programme (Mar 15) at the India International Centre when the Media Foundation awarded Shahina KK, Chameli Devi Award for her outstanding works with Tahelka.
    Shahena told that the award came timely as the next day Kernataka High Court was to hear her case.

    The writer has aptly focused on the issue which merit appreciation. However one may differ with concluding paragraph. Yes, there have been cases of illegal detention and torture or even extrajudicial killings; but it would be unfair to generalise it saying, “Carrying Muslim name deserves and qualifies for the above treatment!”

    Shafaque Alam

    • Mahtab Alam permalink
      March 21, 2011 8:55 PM

      To Shafaque,

      Thanks for your kind appreciation and I am glad you were there at the Award function.

      But while mentioning that, it would be unfair to generalise it saying, “Carrying Muslim name deserves and qualifies for the above treatment!”. But what you forget to tell us is what Shahina had herself said at the funtion,

      ‘Unfortunately, anybody carrying a Muslim name, no matter whether he or she is a believer, agnostic or atheist has to keep this as an opening line on every occasion of a dialogue in public. I have hardly practiced any religion right from my adolescence yet I have to make this kind of a statement. ”



  3. March 21, 2011 9:31 PM

    I remember reading an excerpt from Madhu Trehan’s book (whose complete title I can’t recollect) ‘…Tehelka as metaphor’ where she quotes a woman whose husband was arbitrarily arrested for financing Tehelka.

    She says, on her husband’s arrest, “I realized that only reason we’re free is because they don’t want us in there”.

    We’re not out here because we haven’t committed crimes, or because we have a clean record. There are people with dirty records who live to see their grandchildren graduate.

    We’re here because we the people in power don’t want to see us in there. The day they do, we’re screwed.

  4. Dr Mishra permalink
    March 23, 2011 2:29 PM

    Dear Mahtab and Shahina
    It is a well known fact that some sections of the police are brainless testosterone driven thugs who at the very least, slap a suspect brought to the thana, and some go a lot further.
    And yes, the lower you are down the socio economic ladder, the higher your chances of mistreatment. Or if sections of your community are involved in terror (Khalistanis in 1980s or muslims after that), then yes even survival is an issue.
    There is no easy solution. Good leadership and transparent investigation of any alleged atrocity would help. BUT I DO DISAGREE COMPLETELTY WITH THIS NEGATIVE AND WISHY-WASHY TEARFUL APPROACH by Shahina, who says in her opening statement that- I am a muslim and not a terrorist. This kind of nihilistic and overemotional attitude, while not intellectually dissecting the reasons for the crackdown on the muslim radicals, is counter-productive to the n=muslim community unable or unwilling to address the gorilla in their midst.

    Your statement calling the Batla house encounter as ‘infamous’ gives your own bias away. That Azamgarh has a very real link to Islamic terror and mafia is very aptly demonstrated by the emergence of dons like Abu Salem and is well covered by the bestseller by Suketu Mehta who had written ‘Maximum City’ where a decade ago his research had shown quite clearly the alarming radicalisation in Azamgarh.

    Still, in the end I say- more power to Tehelka and all good investigative journalism, and congrats to Shahina.
    Dr Mishra

  5. Dr Mishra permalink
    March 23, 2011 2:32 PM

    ps- you have quoted only muslim examples. Sadly there are far more examples of police brutality on a daily basis committed on the very poor, no matter what religion or caste they belong to.

  6. Sadman29 permalink
    July 31, 2011 8:58 AM

    As long as majority-minority perception persists in a society, this feeling will be there.


  1. What does it mean to be a Muslim in India today? | IMO
  2. Modi’s victory 2014: Paradigm shift of Indian politics

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71,854 other followers

%d bloggers like this: