Skip to content

Jaypee and Mahyco as Indian Express sponsors: There is conflict of Interest here, Sir

January 13, 2012

[The following is a statement issued by concerned individuals regarding the sponsorship of the ‘Excellence in Journalism’ awards organized by the Indian Express.]

On January 10 and 11, 2012, half page advertisements in the Indian Express (IE) newspaper (at least in the Delhi edition) announced that on Jan 16, 2012 the IE Excellence in Journalism Awards will be given. The advertisement also said that the main sponsor is Jaypee Group and among other sponsors include the Mahyco Monsanto.

One may recall that Indian Express has been on a campaign mode advocating big dams in general. It has been specifically campaigning against the movements like the Narmada Bachao Andolan. In March April 2006 the paper specifically ran a campaign against NBA and also against the then Union Minister Prof Saifuddin Soz[1]. In Oct 2010 the paper ran a campaign for large hydro projects in the North East India when the then Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh held an open public hearing on these projects in Guwahati and then wrote to the Prime Minister, raising concerns about so many hydro projects being taken up in NE India and the impacts thereof.

Now it is well known that the Jaypee group is India’s largest dam building contractor, largest private sector developer and plans to develop many more including in the North East India, which was the subject of Indian Express campaign in Oct 2010. Jaypee group is also the contractor for the largest of the Narmada Dams, namely Sardar Sarovar Project. The group is planning to develop the 2700 MW Lower Siang and 500 MW Hirong Hydropower projects in Arunachal Pradesh, for example. It may also not be irrelevant to mention here that the Jaypee group has a pathetic record in terms of social, environmental and human rights issues in the projects it is involved in. More recently, in January 2012, India’s market regulator Sebi fined Jaypee Group Rs 6 million for the illegal practice of insider trading[2]. All these facts are very much relevant for any business group to sponsor awards for excellence in journalism, particularly when the awards are also for “ethics in reporting”[3].

The Indian Express campaign in Oct 2010, willy nilly helped Jaypee groups’ interests. And now Jaypee is sponsoring the IE Journalism award. Shall we call this conflict of interest or quid pro quo? Should a media house accept such sponsorship from a group that has directly benefited from the campaign that was run by the media house? And when the business group has such abysmal reputation?

Earlier in January-February 2010, when Jairam Ramesh held a series of public hearings to get a cross section of views on Bt Brinjal, Indian Express had launched a campaign[4] against Jairam Ramesh and FOR GM crops. It is clear that the campaign hugely benefited GM crop companies and the biggest among them in the world (Monsanto) has an Indian arm Mahyco Monsanto, which is the biggest GM seed company of India. Mahyco Monsanto now is one of the sponsors of the Indian Express Excellence in Journalism awards.

So the same set of questions that arise about relation between Jaypee group and IE also arise for Mahyco Monsanto: Is this conflict of interest or quid pro quo? Is this not intellectual corruption? Should not the lobbyist media groups like Indian Express keep away from getting sponsorships from the organisations that their lobbying helps? This is particularly true if media group wants to retain any credibility to the effect that it is still speaking in public interest, which we assume they should be.

We would like to clarify that we are not raising any doubts about the genuineness, independence and excellence of the jury or those journalists who may get this award.

Prashant Bhushan, Senior Supreme Court Lawyer, Delhi (

EAS Sarma (for secretary, Govt of India, Andhra Pradesh

Himanshu Thakkar, SANDRP, Delhi (,

Shripad Dharmadhikary, Manthan Adhyayan Kendra, MP (

Manshi Asher, Him Dhara, Environment research and action collective, HP (

Joy KJ, Soppecom, Maharashtra (

Dr Latha Anantha, River Research Centre, Kerala (

Soumitra Ghosh, NESPON, W Bengal (

Hemant Dhyani, Ganga Ahvahan, Uttarakhand (

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Alok permalink
    January 13, 2012 3:45 PM

    IE under its current editor has always been pro-big business. One can have problems with these views but at least they are intellectually consistent. The charge of selling out to Jaypee & Monsanto doesn’t hold IMO.

  2. Dinesh Sinha permalink
    January 13, 2012 4:20 PM

    This is a clear case of conflict of interest (or rather synergy of interest). Actually, “ethics” is a difficult concept to internalize and practice.

  3. komal mohite permalink
    January 14, 2012 1:54 PM

    The Indian Express is a pro-neo liberalism, pro-BJP & anti-poor newspaper. Hardly a surprise considering that half their columnists are from the corporate world talking about problems that are not there. This was quite evident in their vilification of Anna Hazare & the anti-corruption movement, their stand on FDI in multi brand retail, MGNREGS & so on. Journalist P.Sainath has spoken in great detail about these corporate-sponsored awards in journalism & the media’s structural compulsion to lie. Both are part of this post-liberalization phenomenon of paid news. Therefore, expecting the Indian Express to speak in public interest is like expecting the RSS mouthpiece Panchajanya to speak in favour of minority rights.

  4. Mohan Rao permalink
    January 14, 2012 7:01 PM

    I would like to testify to this. I was present at the launch of Dom Moraes’s last book, co-authored with Sarayu Shrivastava. I have no idea why Penguin had asked Mr.Shekar Gupta to release the book. Mr Moraes, ill with cancer, was present, as was Sarayu Shrivastava.

    What we heard was as graceless as astonishing. Mr.Shekar Gupta started his speech by saying he had not read the book, but how honoured he felt to be occupant of the chair once occupied by Dom Moraes’s father, Mr.Frank Moraes. He then went on to say that the last book he read was in 1984, when he was on his way to cover the Punjab crisis. After that he had tried to read a novel by an Indian novelist who became the first Indian woman to win the Booker Prize, but he had not been able to read it beyond 123 pages.

    So there you have it, an editor who boasts of not reading. I suspect he might have read Chetan Bhagat though.

    What else would you expect if you have editors like this?

  5. January 19, 2012 2:35 PM

    While I agree with the content and must thanks the signatories who have enlightened us on the dark history of these sponsors and the way The Indian Express has been deeply entrenched with them, by pushing their agenda ideologically, I fail to understand what would they tell about some of their friend within a newly established brand called ‘Team Anna’. I am sure they would have seen the news paper reports about Arvind Kejriwal saying that Vedanta Foundation still funds Kiran Bedi’s organisation. Don’t they and their friend, Arvind (such a good soul that he sees problems with only financial corruption of 2G spectrum) know about the dark history of Vedanta in mining?

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71,865 other followers

%d bloggers like this: